|
Business and Human Rights: a resource website |
|
Freedom of expression & information |
| NEW (recent additions to this section; top item is most recent addition) |
| Intel e-mail case heads to state high court [California] - Ruling could redefine parameters of free speech rights in cyberspace - When Ken Hamidi was fired from Intel over a work injury dispute...the engineer sent six e-mail messages to thousands of Intel employees from 1996 to 1998, criticizing the computer giant's employment practices. Intel asked Hamidi to stop and tried to block his e-mails, but to no avail. (Harriet Chiang, San Francisco Chronicle, 2 Apr. 2003) |
under construction
Websites:
Political opinion/trade union membership: Novo Nordisk equal opportunities toolbox in Novo Nordisk equal opportunities toolbox (Novo Nordisk)
2003:
Intel e-mail case heads to state high court [California] - Ruling could redefine parameters of free speech rights in cyberspace - When Ken Hamidi was fired from Intel over a work injury dispute...the engineer sent six e-mail messages to thousands of Intel employees from 1996 to 1998, criticizing the computer giant's employment practices. Intel asked Hamidi to stop and tried to block his e-mails, but to no avail. (Harriet Chiang, San Francisco Chronicle, 2 Apr. 2003)
Supreme Court to take up Nike and free speech [USA] - S.F. activist sued, saying firm lied about working conditions (Bob Egelko, San Francisco Chronicle, 11 Jan. 2003)
2002:
press release: China: Internet users at risk of arbitrary detention, torture and even execution (Amnesty International, 26 Nov. 2002)
Nike in free speech battle [Kasky v. Nike: U.S. court case relating to Nike’s treatment of workers in a Vietnam factory] (Rebecca Spencer, Corporate Watch [UK], 13 Nov. 2002)
Short-sighted victories in free speech - The case against Nike in the US [Kasky v. Nike, case alleging false advertising regarding labour conditions]...could have devastating consequences for companies and campaigners alike, says Mallen Baker -...The risks involved in disclosure have just gone through the roof. (Mallen Baker, in Ethical Corporation Magazine, 13 Nov. 2002)
Kodak Fires Worker For Anti-Gay Message [USA] - Eastman Kodak Co., known for its support of a diverse workforce, is under fire for firing an employee for disagreeing with the company's position on supporting gay and lesbian workers...Recent lawsuits against AT&T and Verizon Communications involved employees who felt they were being unfairly reprimanded for not supporting the companies' respective diversity policies. (C Lisotta, Gay.com/PlanetOut.com Network, 31 Oct. 2002)
California supreme court decision potentially devastating for corporate responsibility reporting and SRI funds worldwide - The decision by the California courts against Nike [in the case of Kasky v Nike, relating to Nike's public defense of allegations of “sweatshop” labour in its Asian factories] has created a great deal of uncertainty among US corporations, reports Peter Clarke (Peter Clarke, Director of SRIMedia, in Ethical Corporation Magazine, 17 Oct. 2002)
Shell faces litigation - Fourteen individual plaintiffs filed a class action suit [in a U.S. court] against Royal Dutch Petroleum and Shell Transport, plc, on September 20 for alleged human rights abuses in Ogoniland, Nigeria...the complaint alleges that Shell knowingly instigated, planned and facilitated in unprovoked attacks by the former Nigerian military government against the unarmed residents of Ogoniland, resulting in murder and gross human rights abuses. (Tomorrow: Your sustainable business toolkit, 26 Sep. 2002)
AltaVista tries to beat Chinese ban - AltaVista has hit back at the Chinese ban on its search engine, promising to find alternative ways to reach China's 46 million surfers. (BBC News, 12 Sep. 2002)
Google, Alta Vista: Resist Chinese Censorship - Dear Dr. Schmidt and Mr. Barnett [CEOs of Google & AltaVista]: We are writing to express our outrage at the Chinese government's reported blocking of access to Google and AltaVista...Companies that do business in China have an opportunity to play a proactive role in opening space for Chinese citizens to express themselves freely. Unfortunately, Yahoo!, along with a number of Chinese internet businesses and research institutes, has voluntarily signed a public pledge on "self-discipline" in China that commits the company to investigate and block websites based on their content. (Human Rights Watch, 7 Sep. 2002)
ANZ Fined Over Free Speech [Australia] - The Finance Sector Union today called on the ANZ to review its relationship with its workers after the Federal Court fined it $10,000 for breaches of the Workplace Relations Act. Justice Wilcox imposed the fine after fined the ANZ had breached the law on four counts for threatening to sack suburban branch manager Joy Buckland for talking to the media about work issues. (LaborNET, Labor Council of New South Wales [Australia], 23 Aug. 2002)
China's Workers -...[China] continues to deny its workers the most basic rights of association, petition and expression -- including rights that China, by accepting other international accords, long ago promised to respect. (editorial, Washington Post, 15 Aug. 2002)
2001:
Tech Firms Vie to Veil Web Sites for the Saudis: Net-Filtering Deal Could Yield Millions - Nearly a dozen software companies, most of them American, are competing for a contract to help Saudi Arabia block access to Web sites that the Saudi government deems inappropriate for that nation's half-million Internet users...Responding to critics of the sale of content filters, software company executives say that they are only providing politically neutral tools..."The government feels the need to intervene. Once we sell them the product, we can't enforce how they use it." [Matthew Holt, a sales executive for Secure Computing, of San Jose, California] (Jennifer Lee, New York Times, in International Herald Tribune, 20 Nov. 2001)