back
to home
Business
and Human Rights: a resource website
|
Intellectual
property / Patents & traditional
knowledge / Biopiracy |
See also the following sections of this website:
NEW
(recent additions to
this section; top item is most recent addition) |
Drug
industry debates duty to society -...To what extent should pharmaceutical
companies be accountable for including minorities in their studies of new
medicines? What issues should be considered in balancing the enforcement of
patents and the availability of life-saving drugs?
These questions and more arose at the opening day of
a conference examining the "Grand Bargain" between society and the
drug industry (Lewis Krauskopf, NorthJersey.com,
22 Apr. 2003)
Merck
board approves spinoff of Medco business -...shareholders [at Merck's annual
meeting] rejected two proposals that raised moral issues: A Wisconsin-based
religious group...said the board should develop "ethical criteria" on
extending patents for prescription drugs. The group argued that generic drugs
"expand access to needed treatments," and that making small changes to
keep a patented drug under protection brings higher costs to consumers and
discourages innovation.
The board said the company will defend its patents
but "will not pursue baseless legal or other remedies designed merely to
delay the entry of generic medicines."
(Jeffrey Gold, Associated Press, 22 Apr. 2003)
Investing
with an agenda - Calpers' social, corporate activism drawing attention in bear
market as some fear its aggressive tactics may cost governments, firms money
-...When the AIDS Healthcare Foundation wanted drug maker GlaxoSmithKline PLC to
lower the $438 a person it charges in developing countries for a year's worth of
AZT, it turned to an unlikely ally: America's largest pension fund...In its
letter to Glaxo...Calpers praised the drug maker for ''established and effective
humanitarian programs.'' But Calpers pressed Glaxo to ''immediately and
continually evaluate the company's humanitarian efforts in light of a changing
environment, including its response to the AIDS epidemic.'' Calpers wants
Glaxo's findings to be scrutinized by an independent body like Doctors Without
Borders. (Chris Gaither, Boston Globe, 20 Apr. 2003)
Strict
International Patent Laws Hurt Developing Countries - What was the South African
lawsuit about, and what does it tell us about globalization? [regarding lawsuit
filed in 1998 by 39 pharmaceutical companies against South Africa, seeking to
stop the government from producing generic drugs to make treatment affordable
for the country's AIDS victims; after an international public outcry the
companies dropped the lawsuit] (Amy Kapczynski, YaleGlobal, 16 Dec.
2002)
New
call for cheap Aids drugs - The largest pension fund in the US has called on
British drug giant GSK to make access to Aids drugs easier by cutting prices and
easing patent controls. (BBC News, 15 Apr. 2003)
State
AIDS Drug Assistance Programs [ADAPs], NASTAD Negotiate Lower Price for Fuzeon
With Roche [USA] -...The meetings...brought together ADAP representatives from
California, Florida, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, North
Carolina and Texas...with representatives from Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck,
Pfizer, Abbott Laboratories, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Gilead Sciences and
Bristol-Myers Squibb...Roche was the only company to come to a
"satisfactory agreement" with the ADAPs...Five other drug companies
have decided to continue negotiations, which are expected to conclude by late
next month. (Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report, 31 Mar. 2003)
Pharmaceuticals
held to ransom? - Twelve of Europe's biggest investors have united in an attempt
to challenge multinational drugs firms to improve access to medicines in poor
countries, but, asks Jim Gough, will it change anything? -...According to Olivia
Lankester, a senior analyst at Isis, eight leading pharmaceutical companies were
alerted before the release of the investors' statement of good practice, and
'many of them' said they would welcome the initiative...GSK [GlaxoSmithKline]
chief executive Jean-Pierre Garnier insists the company's policies, initiatives
and commitments are already consistent with the investors' proposed framework.
He believes GSK is the only company undertaking research and development into
the prevention and treatment of the World Health Organisation's top priority
diseases in the developing world, HIV/Aids, tuberculosis and malaria...Nathan
Ford, MSF's [Médecins Sans Frontières'] access to medicines adviser, says:
'I'm completely unconvinced that the industry is responding anything like
adequately enough"...The Scottish arm of the Association of the British
Pharmaceutical Industry...said access to drugs can be limited by weaknesses
among the governments of poor nations. A spokeswoman said: 'Everybody
concentrates on the patents -- but that is not the major issue. (Sunday
Herald [Scotland], 30 Mar. 2003)
The
Dangers to Doha: The Risks of Failure in the Trade Round - The following is an
address by Clare Short, MP, Britain's Secretary of State for International
Development, to the Royal Institute of International Affairs...Today I want to
talk to you about an urgent issue: the dangers to the Doha Trade Round and the
imperative of acting now to secure a successful outcome of the Round. I want to
spell out why this matters so much to developing countries. (Clare Short, UK
Secretary of State for International Development, 25 Mar. 2003)
Drug
giants 'next tobacco' warning - The pharmaceutical industry risks becoming the
"new tobacco" unless it cleans up its act in developing countries, an
influential group of investors has warned. The global drugs industry must do
more to help poor countries facing health crises, according to investors from
the US and continental Europe. (BBC News, 24 Mar. 2003)
United
by Free Trade -...Meanwhile, the U.S. position on loosening patent rules on
drugs for very poor developing countries is also in need of reexamination. It is
unacceptable that millions of victims of AIDS, tuberculosis and other epidemics
cannot afford the drugs that could cure them because the American drug industry
keeps the prices too high. Talks on this issue collapsed last December, and
although U.S. negotiators have agreed not to pursue poor countries that
manufacture generic versions of critical drugs, the onus is still on the United
States to make sure the drugs are genuinely and easily available where they need
to be. (editorial, Washington Post, 24 Mar. 2003)
The
threat to science as a 'public good' -...Many feel that, through legislation on
issues that range from intellectual property rights to copyright on databases,
attempts to turn scientific information into private property have gone too far.
The WSIS [World Summit on the Information Society] presents an ideal opportunity
to highlight this issue before the world's political leaders, and help forge an
international consensus that urgent measures are needed to redress the balance
between public access to, and private control over, scientific data...Developing
nations are at particular risk from these trends. (David Dickson, comment, SciDev.Net,
17 Mar. 2003)
Patent
relaxation threatens Aids drugs -...The US develops 70 per cent of all new drugs
and most Aids drugs. Yet 25 per cent fewer drug companies are working on Aids
drugs than a few years ago, partly because their previous discoveries are being
ripped off.
The US trade representative should continue to stand
up for patents against the rest of the world, allowing only the poorest 60 or so
countries to copy patented drugs. (Roger
Bate, Africa Fighting Malaria, letter to Financial Times, 18 Feb. 2003)
Patents
are not the problem with drugs access -...In reality, 99 per cent of the World
Health Organisation's list of essential drugs are not patented - yet access to
these medicines is abysmally low. The reason is the grinding poverty in poor
countries and a lack of health infrastructure. If rich countries wanted to show
that they took poor country concerns seriously, they should start reducing
agricultural subsidies. (Richard Tren, Africa Fighting Malaria, letter to Financial
Times, 2 Jan. 2003)
Investors
pressure drug firms on pricing - Multinationals urged to allow developing
countries to sidestep patents on life-saving treatments - Drug companies
were given a stark warning yesterday that blocking access to life-saving drugs
at affordable prices by poor countries could undermine public confidence in them
and damage the value of their shares in the long term. The unprecedented
pressure on the multinationals comes from major City institutions with
investments of more than £600bn and backed by well-known names such as Jupiter,
Schroders and Legal and General Investment Management. (Sarah Boseley, Guardian
[UK], 25 Mar. 2003)
- full statement: "Investor
Statement on pharmaceutical companies and the public health crisis in
emerging markets" (ISIS Asset Mgt., Universities Superannuation
Scheme, Insight Investment, Henderson Global Investors, Schroders, Legal
& General Investment Mgt., Morley Fund Mgt., Co-operative Insurance,
Jupiter, Ethos, PGGM, Central Finance Board of the Methodist Church, 24 Mar.
2003)
|
World Intellectual Property Organization
(WIPO)
website:
WIPO homepage {···english···français···español···arabic}
Intellectual
Property and Traditional Knowledge, Innovations and Creativity: Introduction
Intellectual
Property and Traditional Knowledge, Innovations and Creativity: Documents
Draft
Report on Fact-finding Missions on Intellectual Property and Traditional
Knowledge (1998-1999)
Other websites:
Biodiversity,
Access, Indigenous Knowledge and IPRs [intellectual property rights] (Third
World Network)
Biopiracy
and appropriation of traditional knowledge (Third World Network)
Consumer Project on
Technology
A
Global Roadmap for Modern Biotechnology: An issues-based navigational tool with
policy options for decision-makers in the public and private sectors
(International Chamber of Commerce)
Global
Trade Negotiations: Intellectual Property Rights
(Centre for International Development at
Harvard University)
Indigenous
Knowledge (Global Development Gateway)
Indigenous
Knowledge and Community Rights (Third World Network)
Intellectual
Property Rights (Global Trade Negotiations Home Page, Center for
International Development at Harvard University)
Intellectual
Property and Traditional Knowledge, Innovations and Creativity (World
Intellectual Property Organization)
Novo
Nordisk positions: Intellectual property rights and patenting (Novo Nordisk)
PhRMA
Position Papers on Intellectual Property (Pharmaceutical Research and
Manufacturers of America)
TRIPS,
sui generis and plant variety protection (Third World Network)
World Trade
Organization website (World Trade Organization)
World
Trade Organization and Indigenous Peoples (Indigenous Environmental Network)
Other materials:
2003:
Drug
industry debates duty to society -...To what extent should pharmaceutical
companies be accountable for including minorities in their studies of new
medicines? What issues should be considered in balancing the enforcement of
patents and the availability of life-saving drugs?
These questions and more arose at the opening day of
a conference examining the "Grand Bargain" between society and the
drug industry (Lewis Krauskopf, NorthJersey.com,
22 Apr. 2003)
Merck
board approves spinoff of Medco business -...shareholders [at Merck's annual
meeting] rejected two proposals that raised moral issues: A Wisconsin-based
religious group...said the board should develop "ethical criteria" on
extending patents for prescription drugs. The group argued that generic drugs
"expand access to needed treatments," and that making small changes to
keep a patented drug under protection brings higher costs to consumers and
discourages innovation.
The board said the company will defend its patents
but "will not pursue baseless legal or other remedies designed merely to
delay the entry of generic medicines."
(Jeffrey Gold, Associated Press, 22 Apr. 2003)
Investing
with an agenda - Calpers' social, corporate activism drawing attention in bear
market as some fear its aggressive tactics may cost governments, firms money
-...When the AIDS Healthcare Foundation wanted drug maker GlaxoSmithKline PLC to
lower the $438 a person it charges in developing countries for a year's worth of
AZT, it turned to an unlikely ally: America's largest pension fund...In its
letter to Glaxo...Calpers praised the drug maker for ''established and effective
humanitarian programs.'' But Calpers pressed Glaxo to ''immediately and
continually evaluate the company's humanitarian efforts in light of a changing
environment, including its response to the AIDS epidemic.'' Calpers wants
Glaxo's findings to be scrutinized by an independent body like Doctors Without
Borders. (Chris Gaither, Boston Globe, 20 Apr. 2003)
New
call for cheap Aids drugs - The largest pension fund in the US has called on
British drug giant GSK to make access to Aids drugs easier by cutting prices and
easing patent controls. (BBC News, 15 Apr. 2003)
State
AIDS Drug Assistance Programs [ADAPs], NASTAD Negotiate Lower Price for Fuzeon
With Roche [USA] -...The meetings...brought together ADAP representatives from
California, Florida, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, North
Carolina and Texas...with representatives from Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck,
Pfizer, Abbott Laboratories, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Gilead Sciences and
Bristol-Myers Squibb...Roche was the only company to come to a
"satisfactory agreement" with the ADAPs...Five other drug companies
have decided to continue negotiations, which are expected to conclude by late
next month. (Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report, 31 Mar. 2003)
Pharmaceuticals
held to ransom? - Twelve of Europe's biggest investors have united in an attempt
to challenge multinational drugs firms to improve access to medicines in poor
countries, but, asks Jim Gough, will it change anything? -...According to Olivia
Lankester, a senior analyst at Isis, eight leading pharmaceutical companies were
alerted before the release of the investors' statement of good practice, and
'many of them' said they would welcome the initiative...GSK [GlaxoSmithKline]
chief executive Jean-Pierre Garnier insists the company's policies, initiatives
and commitments are already consistent with the investors' proposed framework.
He believes GSK is the only company undertaking research and development into
the prevention and treatment of the World Health Organisation's top priority
diseases in the developing world, HIV/Aids, tuberculosis and malaria...Nathan
Ford, MSF's [Médecins Sans Frontières'] access to medicines adviser, says:
'I'm completely unconvinced that the industry is responding anything like
adequately enough"...The Scottish arm of the Association of the British
Pharmaceutical Industry...said access to drugs can be limited by weaknesses
among the governments of poor nations. A spokeswoman said: 'Everybody
concentrates on the patents -- but that is not the major issue. (Sunday
Herald [Scotland], 30 Mar. 2003)
The
Dangers to Doha: The Risks of Failure in the Trade Round - The following is an
address by Clare Short, MP, Britain's Secretary of State for International
Development, to the Royal Institute of International Affairs...Today I want to
talk to you about an urgent issue: the dangers to the Doha Trade Round and the
imperative of acting now to secure a successful outcome of the Round. I want to
spell out why this matters so much to developing countries. (Clare Short, UK
Secretary of State for International Development, 25 Mar. 2003)
Investors
pressure drug firms on pricing - Multinationals urged to allow developing
countries to sidestep patents on life-saving treatments - Drug companies
were given a stark warning yesterday that blocking access to life-saving drugs
at affordable prices by poor countries could undermine public confidence in them
and damage the value of their shares in the long term. The unprecedented
pressure on the multinationals comes from major City institutions with
investments of more than £600bn and backed by well-known names such as Jupiter,
Schroders and Legal and General Investment Management. (Sarah Boseley, Guardian
[UK], 25 Mar. 2003)
- full statement: "Investor
Statement on pharmaceutical companies and the public health crisis in
emerging markets" (ISIS Asset Mgt., Universities Superannuation
Scheme, Insight Investment, Henderson Global Investors, Schroders, Legal
& General Investment Mgt., Morley Fund Mgt., Co-operative Insurance,
Jupiter, Ethos, PGGM, Central Finance Board of the Methodist Church, 24 Mar.
2003)
Drug
giants 'next tobacco' warning - The pharmaceutical industry risks becoming the
"new tobacco" unless it cleans up its act in developing countries, an
influential group of investors has warned. The global drugs industry must do
more to help poor countries facing health crises, according to investors from
the US and continental Europe. (BBC News, 24 Mar. 2003)
United
by Free Trade -...Meanwhile, the U.S. position on loosening patent rules on
drugs for very poor developing countries is also in need of reexamination. It is
unacceptable that millions of victims of AIDS, tuberculosis and other epidemics
cannot afford the drugs that could cure them because the American drug industry
keeps the prices too high. Talks on this issue collapsed last December, and
although U.S. negotiators have agreed not to pursue poor countries that
manufacture generic versions of critical drugs, the onus is still on the United
States to make sure the drugs are genuinely and easily available where they need
to be. (editorial, Washington Post, 24 Mar. 2003)
The
threat to science as a 'public good' -...Many feel that, through legislation on
issues that range from intellectual property rights to copyright on databases,
attempts to turn scientific information into private property have gone too far.
The WSIS [World Summit on the Information Society] presents an ideal opportunity
to highlight this issue before the world's political leaders, and help forge an
international consensus that urgent measures are needed to redress the balance
between public access to, and private control over, scientific data...Developing
nations are at particular risk from these trends. (David Dickson, comment, SciDev.Net,
17 Mar. 2003)
Patent
relaxation threatens Aids drugs -...The US develops 70 per cent of all new drugs
and most Aids drugs. Yet 25 per cent fewer drug companies are working on Aids
drugs than a few years ago, partly because their previous discoveries are being
ripped off.
The US trade representative should continue to stand
up for patents against the rest of the world, allowing only the poorest 60 or so
countries to copy patented drugs. (Roger
Bate, Africa Fighting Malaria, letter to Financial Times, 18 Feb. 2003)
DRUGS:
WHO To Push WTO On Patents -...According to Brazilian Health Minister Humberto
Costa, the WHO is planning to send a letter to the WTO calling for public health
interests to be given priority over the interests of the pharmaceutical industry
(UN Wire, 28 Jan. 2003)
HIV/AIDS:
WHO Welcomes Drug Makers' Patent Moves - The World Health Organization Friday
welcomed new initiatives by several drug companies to license their patents to
generic manufacturers for production of certain HIV/AIDS drugs. (UN Wire,
27 Jan. 2003)
Patents
are not the problem with drugs access -...In reality, 99 per cent of the World
Health Organisation's list of essential drugs are not patented - yet access to
these medicines is abysmally low. The reason is the grinding poverty in poor
countries and a lack of health infrastructure. If rich countries wanted to show
that they took poor country concerns seriously, they should start reducing
agricultural subsidies. (Richard Tren, Africa Fighting Malaria, letter to Financial
Times, 2 Jan. 2003)
2002:
Strict
International Patent Laws Hurt Developing Countries - What was the South African
lawsuit about, and what does it tell us about globalization? [regarding lawsuit
filed in 1998 by 39 pharmaceutical companies against South Africa, seeking to
stop the government from producing generic drugs to make treatment affordable
for the country's AIDS victims; after an international public outcry the
companies dropped the lawsuit] (Amy Kapczynski, YaleGlobal, 16 Dec.
2002)
DRUGS:
Access Must Not Harm World Trade, WTO Head Says - "...if we fail to protect
the patents of entrepreneurs who channel billions of dollars into developing new
drugs, our hopes of finding lifesaving medication for currently untreatable
ailments will be dashed," he [WTO Director General Supachai Panitchpakdi]
said (UN Wire, 16 Dec. 2002)
press release: Access
to essential drugs may be undermined by global patent agreement -...The Panos
Report, Patents, Pills and Public Health: can TRIPS deliver? warns that patent
legislation is not being debated widely enough in most developing countries, and
the process of introducing it needs to be more consultative and transparent.
(Panos Institute, 1 Dec. 2002)
Medicine
Access in Dispute - With the rich countries eager to renege on promises made at
the November 2001 World Trade Organization (WTO) ministerial meeting in Doha,
Qatar, developing countries in November rejected rich country proposals that
public health advocates said would significantly limit poor countries' access to
essential medicines. (Multinational Monitor, Dec. 2002)
Industrialised
North Puts Brakes on WTO Medicine Accord - Negotiators at the World Trade
Organisation (WTO) failed Friday to reach an agreement to ensure poor countries
access to essential medicines. Health activists blame the fiasco on opposition
from the United States and a handful of other industrialised countries.
(Gustavo Capdevila, Inter Press Service, 29 Nov. 2002)
US
drug makers accused of bullying - The US government and the giant pharmaceutical
companies are continuing to bully poor countries to tighten up their patent
rules, hampering efforts to obtain cheap medicines for people with diseases such
as HIV/Aids, according to a new report [by Oxfam] (Sarah Boseley, Guardian
[UK], 14 Nov. 2002)
DRUGS:
WTO Ministers Meet To Tackle Generics - A two-day World Trade Organization
ministerial meeting was slated to open today in Sydney, with much discussion
expected to focus on amending international patent rules to provide poor
countries with access to cheap generic medicines. (UN Wire, 14 Nov.
2002)
Tiered
pricing alone is not enough - Oxfam welcomes the [European] Commission’s initiative to
help reduce the price of essential medicines for developing countries. This must
now be coupled with fundamental reform of global patent rules which are
preventing poor people getting access to the cheapest possible medicines...Oxfam
believe that the Commission’s decision to limit the scope to just HIV, TB and
Malaria and to the very poorest countries in the world could result in terrible
development outcomes. (Oxfam, 4 Nov. 2002)
MEDICINES:
2 Billion People Lack Access To Essential Drugs, WHO Says -...Medecins Sans
Frontieres' Bernard Pecoul said patents, particularly on AIDS drugs, lead to
higher prices, "with the direct result that people in developing countries
cannot afford to save their own lives" (UN Wire, 22 Oct. 2002)
Group
Moves to Protect Farmers' Right to Seeds -...Farmers' seed rights, according to
ActionAid, have become increasingly jeopardized by the global expansion of
intellectual property rights, which are often characterized by the use of
patents, copyrights, or trademarks, and enforced by international conventions
such as TRIPs. (Kalyani, OneWorld South Asia, 15 Oct. 2002)
Traditional
knowledge of biodiversity in Asia-Pacific: Problems of Piracy & Protection
(GRAIN [Genetic Resources Action International] and Kalpavriksh, Oct. 2002)
Patent
laws hamper war on poverty - The fight against poverty in the developing world
is being hampered by stringent patent laws imposed by rich countries, an
independent commission said (Heather Stewart, Guardian [UK], 13 Sep.
2002)
China
may break Aids drug patents - China will be forced to break patents on Western
Aids drugs unless foreign pharmaceutical companies agree to cut prices by early
next year, a top health official said. (BBC News, 6 Sep. 2002)
Innovative
measures required to protect indigenous knowledge -...As controversies
surrounding indigenous intellectual property rights simmer, UNESCO will hold a
major event at the World Summit on Sustainable Development (August 26 to
September 4) to highlight innovative approaches to protecting and sharing
traditional knowledge. (UNESCO, 22 Aug. 2002)
Indigenous
Peoples' International Summit on Sustainable Development, Kimberly, South
Africa, 20 - 23 August 2002
[added to this site on 5 Aug. 2002]
South
Africa's Aids apartheid -...People who are HIV positive are therefore beginning
to raise demands far beyond the question of medical treatment: the rebuilding of
public services, access to an unconditional basic income of 100 rand (10 euros)
a month, workers' rights...Too expensive for the poorest countries, these drugs
[antiretrovirals] are at the heart of the debate on globalisation. Can patents
take precedence over the right to life? (Philippe Rivière, Le Monde
diplomatique, Aug. 2002)
Kalahari
cactus boosts UK drug firm - An anti-obesity drug made from a Kalahari desert
cactus is a step closer to reality after its developer, UK drug company
Phytopharm, signed a fresh deal with US giant Pfizer...In the hope of staving
off the anger that sometimes surrounds companies which exploit traditional
medicines without rewarding their original discoverers, the company signed a
deal in 1997 with the South African government for a cut of the royalties. (BBC
News, 30 July 2002)
Second
South-South Biopiracy Summit -
"Biopiracy - Ten Years Post-Rio" - Hosted
by Biowatch South Africa - 22-23 August 2002 - Johannesburg, South Africa -
...Aim: To share information and raise awareness on access & benefit
sharing, bioprospecting, biopiracy, intellectual property rights, traditional
knowledge. This day is primarily focused on civil society sharing experiences on
legislation implementation & community experiences through case studies.
(Biowatch South Africa) [added to this site
on 22 July 2002]
New
Standard for Corporate Social Responsibility of Drugs Companies - Oxfam, Save
the Children and VSO have developed an industry standard for assessing the
corporate social responsibility of drugs companies in responding to the health
crisis in the developing world.
- In a new report, Beyond Philanthropy,
published today, the three development agencies propose a set of benchmarks to
assist investors in assessing the social responsibility of pharmaceutical
companies. These benchmarks relate to company policies and practices in five key
areas which impact on access to medicines for the 14 million children and adults
who die each year from infectious diseases, especially HIV/AIDS. The key areas
are: pricing, patents, joint public private initiatives, research and
development and appropriate use of medicines.
(Oxfam, Save the Children and VSO, 16 July 2002)
INDIGENOUS
PEOPLES: Venezuela Pushes Heritage Plan At WIPO - Venezuela has brought before
the World Intellectual Property Organization in Geneva a program aimed at
preserving the knowledge and heritage of its indigenous people through
photographs, video, audio and text and ensuring indigenous groups benefit from
the use of the information, El Universal reported yesterday...Proponents
say countries and businesses -- mainly cosmetic and pharmaceutical companies --
seek insight from ethnic communities on plants, biodiversity and other
traditions but do not compensate them. (UN Wire, 9 July 2002)
Peruvian's
love root under threat - Today ActionAid joins the tug-of-love between poor
farmers and a US corporation over a natural alternative to Viagra.
The international charity is joining the global
campaign calling on PureWorld Botanicals to drop its patents on maca, a sexual
stimulant grown high in the Peruvian mountains. Local people risk losing out on
booming profits as patents lodged by the US corporation could stop them selling
extracts of the plant in the UK and the rest of the world.
(ActionAid, 7 July 2002)
India's
Digital Library Aids Biopirates - Activists - Far from protecting biodiversity
and traditional knowledge, India's new Traditional Knowledge Digital Library
(TKDL) may be just the thing that biopirates have been looking for in navigating
through the country's vast ocean of ancient literature on indigenous herbs and
their uses, critics say. (Ranjit Devraj, Inter Press Service, 4 July
2002)
WIPO
[World Intellectual Property Organisation] moves toward "world" patent
system (GRAIN, July 2002)
WTO
policies criticized [Pakistan] - Organic farming, conservation of indigenous
seeds and modern information on agriculture are prerequisites for getting rid of
the offensive advances of multi-national companies and ensuring food security
for the future generations. This was the crux of a day-long seminar on "The
Agreement of the WTO and Threats to Food Security". (Dawn
[Pakistan], 11 June 2002)
UN
conference backs indigenous peoples drug payout: A global environmental
conference last week hammered out guidelines to encourage big business to pay
indigenous communities for the right to use native plants to make commercial
drugs and cosmetics. (Otti Thomas, Reuters, 22 Apr. 2002)
UN
moves to curb bio-piracy (Tim Hirsch, BBC News, 17 Apr. 2002)
Report of
the In-Depth Study Session on the World Trade Organisation for Human Rights
Professionals: 1-2 February 2002 [includes sections on: "Trade
liberalisation, Development and Human Rights"; "The Agreement on
Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs), Traditional Knowledge, and
Indigenous Peoples' Rights"] (Secretariat of the Study Session on the
WTO / 3D Associates, Apr. 2002)
Bushmen
victory over drug firms [South Africa]: They have faced extinction and poverty
for hundreds of years, but now the San Bushmen of southern Africa stand to make
millions of pounds from a so-called miracle slimming pill being developed by
Western drug companies...'It's a lesson to corporations that they can't come in
and patent traditional knowledge on plants from local communities and get away
with it.' [refers to Pfizer] (Antony Barnett, Observer [UK], 31 Mar.
2002)
Bio
"gold" rush in Chiapas on hold [Mexico]: A $2.5 million project to
research Chiapas plants for possible commercial use was halted after it roused
the ire of indigenous rights activists. When does "bioprospecting"
become "biopiracy"? (Barbara Belejack, NACLA Report on the
Americas [North American Congress on Latin America], Mar.-Apr. 2002)
Patents
put to the test in Reporting
on the Triple Bottom Line 2001: dealing with dilemmas (Novo Nordisk, Mar.
2002)
The
latest Novo Nordisk Triple Bottom Line report: 'Reporting on the Triple Bottom
Line 2001: Dealing with dilemmas' [social/environmental report by Novo Nordisk;
includes sections on: globalisation and its implications for business, access to
healthcare in developing countries, intellectual property rights, diversity and
equal opportunities in the workplace] (Novo Nordisk, Mar. 2002)
Brazil
starts mapping medicinal plant potential:...With the new center, Brazil hopes to
uncover and document more herbal remedies in a bid to preserve and protect its
valuable plant species from bio-pirates who frequently coerce poor Amazon tribes
into extracting plant remedies for export. (Katherine Baldwin, Reuters,
26 Feb. 2002)
China,
Brazil, India, 9 other nations form alliance against biopiracy: China, Brazil,
India, and nine other of the world's most biodiverse countries signed an
alliance Monday to fight biopiracy and press for rules protecting their people's
rights to genetic resources found on their land. (Mark Stevenson, Associated
Press, Environmental News Network website, 19 Feb. 2002)
Charity
chip shocker [UK]: chip shop owners threatened by patent bid - International charity
ActionAid today applies to patent Britain's favourite take-away food - the great
British chip...ActionAid is able to make this claim under new patent rules that
allow companies to get exclusive rights over basic foods and even nature
itself...Salil Shetty, ActionAid's Chief Executive said: "Our chip patent
shows how absurd these patent rules are and highlights the ease with which big
business is using these rules to deprive people of their rights. (ActionAid,
11 Feb. 2002)
WTO
rules 'detrimental' to developing countries [report from World Social Forum in
Porto Alegre, Brazil]: The message from all panellists at the conference was
that the World Trade Organisation's rules on intellectual property rights were
detrimental to developing countries and that reform efforts at its ministerial
meeting in Doha last September were mostly cosmetic. (Raymond Colitt, Financial
Times, 3 Feb. 2002)
Hundreds
of NGOs from more than 50 nations announce support of a treaty to establish the
gene pool as a global commons - Biotech activists to challenge government and
corporate claims on patents on life - Treaty to be centerpiece of international
campaigns around the world (press statement by various NGOs at World Social
Forum, Focus on the Global South website, 1 Feb. 2002)
2001:
Brazil
Sees Promise in Jungle Plants, but Tribes See Peril: The Brazilian government,
increasingly fearful of what it regards as "biopiracy" by foreign
pharmaceutical companies, universities and laboratories, is moving to impose
stricter controls on medicinal plants in the Amazon region. (Larry Rohter, New
York Times, 23 Dec. 2001)
Samoan
Healers to Share AIDS Drug Profits: The families of two Samoan women who passed
on knowledge of a tree's healing powers will share in profits from any AIDS drug
developed from the rain forest plant. (USA Today, 17 Dec. 2001)
Brazil's
Indians take path toward medicinal patents:...In their crusade, Brazilian
officials and Indian representatives this week will take a declaration from a
convention of Indian spiritual leaders and witch doctors to the United Nations'
World Intellectual Property Organization meeting in Geneva. (Andrei Khalip,
Reuters, 12 Dec. 2001)
Intellectual
Property and the Knowledge Gap [regarding intellectual property rules affecting
people's access to medicines, seeds and educational materials, and the ability
of poor countries to develop and participate in global markets] (Oxfam
policy paper, Dec. 2001)
A
disappointing compromise [critique of the new International Treaty on Plant
Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture] (editorial, Seedling,
GRAIN [Genetic Resources Action International], Dec. 2001)
WTO:
Agreement Reached In Doha; January Trade Round Set -...Even in light of the
agreement allowing developing countries to break patents in the name of public
health, the optimism of drug companies has not been dampened, the Wall Street
Journal reports. "This does not change the way we sell our
medicines," said Merck spokeswoman Gwen Fisher. "We do not believe
that our intellectual property rights are in any way diminished," said
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America President Alan Holmer.
"We're satisfied with the language" (UN Wire, 15 Nov. 2001)
Do
patents threaten food security? Global food security is under threat from
"bio-pirates" who take plants from developing countries, change them
slightly then patent the new varieties, according to anti-poverty groups and
activists (Karen Iley, Reuters, 15 Nov. 2001)
WTO
relaxes rule on drug patents: Campaigners hope deal will cut cost of remedies
for diseases which kill millions - Developing countries won a breakthrough deal
on relaxing drug patents at the World Trade Organisation's Doha meeting
yesterday. Campaigners hope it will bring down the cost of remedies for treating
diseases killing millions of poor people every year...campaigners said the US
had undermined its own position by itself threatening to override the patent on
Cipro, the main anti-anthrax remedy last month, even though only four people
have died of the disease. (Charlotte Denny, Guardian [UK], 13 Nov.
2001)
WTO
confirms drugs deal: Trade negotiators at the world trade talks in Doha have
reached broad agreement on a deal to ensure that poor countries have access to
medicines...Ministers are expected to approve a text later on Tuesday relating
to the World Trade Organisation's (WTO) intellectual property rights accord,
known as TRIPS.
The text will state that TRIPS "can and should
be interpreted and implemented in a manner supportive of WTO members' rights to
protect public health and in particular to ensure access to medicines for
all". Senior US trade officials said
that "great progress" had been made on the health issue, and the
success demonstrated to developing countries that the WTO was "part of the
solution, not part of the problem". But they argued the text was a
political statement that did not have legal force.
(Steve Schifferes, BBC News, 13 Nov. 2001)
US
Government's $2.5 Million Biopiracy Project in Mexico Cancelled:
Victory for Indigenous Peoples in Chiapas [regarding
US government-funded ICBG-Maya project aimed at the bioprospecting of Mayan
medicinal plants and traditional knowledge]
(ETCGroup.org, 9 Nov. 2001)
At
trade talks, generic-drug issue key:...Accused of hypocrisy by AIDS groups and
developing nations, the US is now backing off on its hard-line stance on drug
patents, offering new hope for AIDS-ravaged countries such as South Africa.
(Nicole Itano, Christian Science Monitor, 9 Nov. 2001)
AGRICULTURE:
FAO Votes for Broad Limits on Crop Patents - The United Nations Food and
Agriculture Organisation (FAO) Conference has approved an international treaty
that largely bans the patenting of non-genetically modified crops, a step aimed
at protecting plant diversity as a tool for eradicating world hunger. The
International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture is
intended to preserve the diversity of food and agriculture and the ''fair and
equitable sharing of the benefits.'' (Jorge Piña, Inter Press Service, 5
Nov. 2001)
Of
patents and panics: US intellectual property law finely balances competing
interests. Hasty wartime amendments would be risky, says Patti Waldmeir...Bayer,
the Cipro patent-holder, was condemned for using its patent to keep generic
anti-anthrax drugs out of the hands of soon-to-be-sick Americans. The US
secretary of health hinted he might abrogate the company's patent rights - and
then used that threat to negotiate a sharp price cut. (Patti Waldmeir, Financial
Times, 31 Oct. 2001)
The
Bayer facts:...Worried about bioterrorism, Health Canada has ordered 900,000
generic copies of an anti-anthrax pill from a firm that doesn't hold the patent.
The government has bypassed the true patent-holder, on the reasonable-sounding
grounds that anthrax is a potential public emergency...If anthrax were the last
public policy issue on Earth, it might make sense to smash the pharmacy window
and grab the loot. But since we all believe in a future, we must acknowledge
that the free world needs a stable system that reliably delivers innovations,
medical or otherwise. So we'd best respect property rights. (editorial, The
Ottawa Citizen, 20 Oct. 2001)
Health
Minister defends contract for generic antibiotics to treat anthrax [Canada]: Health
Minister Allan Rock is refusing to say whether his department violated patent
law in ordering a large amount of anti-anthrax medication from a generic drug
company.
Nor would Rock say whether he will stick with
generic drug manufacturer Apotex as a source of supply now that brand
manufacturer Bayer says it has ample product to meet Canada's needs. He said he
is not in a position to answer those questions and they will be dealt with when
his officials meet with Bayer officials next week.
(Dennis Bueckert, Canadian Press, 19 Oct. 2001)
Ottawa
accused of breaking its own patent law [regarding Canadian Government's decision
to override Bayer's patent of anti-anthrax drug by ordering a cheaper generic
version]:...The federal government can override a patent in emergency
situations. But, an official emergency has not been declared. And, now Bayer is
upset it was never even consulted.
The German-based pharmaceutical company is even
thinking about suing. Another problem for Ottawa is once the exception is made
to the patent law, how many more will follow? Public
health advocates welcome the renewed debate over patent protection. They say
drug companies get too much protection and the patients too little.
(Domenic Fazioli, Global Television Montreal, 19 Oct. 2001)
TRADE:
India To Seek Changes in WTO Draft in Singapore: India will rally like-minded
developing countries to press for changes in the World Trade Organisation
(WTO)'s draft declaration readied for next month's ministerial conference in
Doha, Qatar...''The draft confirms that WTO is an asymmetric body, biased in
favour of the North against the South, with rules written to protect the
interests of corporations and extinguish the rights of people.'' said Vanadana
Shiva, director of the India-based, Research Foundation for Science, Ecology and
Technology...While developing countries have demanded that the Convention on
Biodiversity take precedence over TRIPS wherever conflicts arose between the WTO
and multilateral environment agreements, the draft favours TRIPS as the guide
for work on indigenous knowledge and biodiversity. (Ranjit Devraj, Inter
Press Service, 11 Oct. 2001)
Gene
patents are legal, EU court rules: A European Union court upheld an EU law
yesterday that allows companies to patent genetic sequences found in plants and
animals, rejecting the Netherlands' attempt to overturn the law (Reuters,
10 Oct. 2001)
'Halt
terror against the earth' [India]: The Maharashtra Government has reportedly
given the rights to a lake - which hitherto was the community resource and a
source of livelihood for the local population - to the soft drinks giant, Coca
Cola, for running one of its several bottling plants in the country. This is not
an isolated case. Globalisation is allowing a handful of corporations such as
Cargill and Vivendi to own and control public land and water through contract
farming, privatisation and commodification of resources. Corporations such as
Monsanto, Syngenta and Novartis are pirating and trying to own and control our
biodiversity, food, medicinal plants and knowledge through patents and IPR
claims such as the neem patents, basmati and other rice patents. (Soma Basu,
The Hindu [India], 5 Oct. 2001)
Biodiversity
Rights Legislation (BRL): Biodiversity Rights Legislation (BRL) is a collection
of public legal documents -- laws, bills and other legislative proposals...BRL
contains the full texts or the Internet addresses (URLs) of emerging laws and
policies that affect peoples' control over agricultural biodiversity in
developing countries. (GRAIN [Genetic Resources Action International], Oct.
2001)
Patenting
GMOs - a difficult question of balance:
Patenting living organisms - a means to create
unfair profit potential for the rich or an efficient way of encouraging new
technologies to conserve dwindling natural resources and promote world food
security? Those are just two sides of the
debate over the complex and sensitive issue of slapping intellectual property
protection on living forms, including genetically-modified organisms (GMOs).
(Karen Iley, Reuters, 25 Sep. 2001)
{···español} Todos
los caminos conducen a la propiedad intelectual en América Latina: La
Fundación Gaia y GRAIN anuncian la publicación de un nuevo informe que analiza
los mecanismos de presión internacional que vienen siendo utilizados para
lograr que los países de América Latina adopten medidas de monopolización
sobre la biodiversidad, en ocasiones normas de derechos de propiedad intelectual
(DPI) que van más allá de lo requerido por el Acuerdo TRIPS de la
Organización Mundial del Comercio. (GRAIN, 19 Sep. 2001)
Bio-pirates
stalk Borneo tribes' treasure trove: Mark Bujang of the Borneo Resources
Institute says the East Malaysian state's natives are in danger of having their
indigenous savvy ripped off by so-called "bio-pirates"...He says his
institute wants Sarawak's multitude of native groups to share in the benefits of
any treatments born from what they have known for generations. (Patrick
Chalmers, Reuters, 5 Sep. 2001)
Patent
laws cause diplomatic uproar: There has been uproar in India this week over a
United States decision to grant a patent to an American company for varieties of
rice similar to basmati. And in Brazil, the government has announced it intends
to break the patent on a vital Aids drug made by a Swiss pharmaceutical company.
The two cases illustrate different aspects of the argument about patents that
pits developing countries against Western big business. (Barnaby Mason, BBC
News, 23 Aug. 2001)
RIGHTS:
NGOs Back UN Call for Globalisation Impact Study: Non-governmental organisations
(NGOs) applaud the decision of a United Nations body to urge a detailed study of
the effects of globalisation and certain trade agreements on human rights.
(Gustavo Capdevila, Inter Press Service, 20 Aug. 2001)
Harnessing
Trade for Development: World trade rules have been developed by the rich and
powerful on the basis of their narrow commercial interests. Rich countries and
powerful corporations have captured a disproportionate share of the benefits of
trade, leaving developing countries and poor people worse off. Trade rules
should be judged on their contribution to poverty reduction, respect for human
rights, and environmental sustainability. (Oxfam, 16 Aug. 2001)
World
Trade Organization, International Monetary Fund respond to [United Nations]
Subcommission report on globalization [which contended that the rules of
international trade and economic regimes did not show sufficient respect for
human rights standards] (United Nations, 8 Aug. 2001)
[United
Nations] Subcommission continues debate on role of international financial
institutions in promoting human rights (United Nations, 8 Aug. 2001)
DRUGS:
Study Presented To UN Calls For More Human Rights Focus - International economic
agreements, including those covering intellectual property rights, should focus
more on the issue of human rights and not bar policies ensuring access to
medicine at affordable prices, said a study presented to the UN Subcommission on
Human Rights yesterday. (UN Wire, 8 Aug. 2001)
[United
Nations] Subcommission on Promotion and Protection of Human Rights discusses
impact of globalization on human rights (United Nations, 7 Aug. 2001)
press release: "TRIPS-plus"
treaties leave WTO in the dust: A report published today by Genetic Resources
Action International (GRAIN) shows the extent to which industrialised countries
are using bilateral treaties to secure ever stronger monopoly rights on
biodiversity in developing countries. (GRAIN, 27 July 2001)
Roadmap
points the way ahead for biotechnology: Business experts serving on ICC
[International Chamber of Commerce] commissions covering environment, trade and
investment, intellectual property and marketing have combined to draw up a
Global Roadmap for Modern Biotechnology. The roadmap contrasts business and
government positions on all the basic issues under debate, including promoting
innovation, building consumer trust and health and environmental issues.
(International Chamber of Commerce, 20 July 2001)
Patently
Obvious: Protection of intellectual property - works of the mind - is the
lifeblood of today's new knowledge economy. But while the benefits to the
multinational pharmaceutical or telecommunication giants are plain, what
relevance do international patent regulations have for developing countries?
(Lifeonline: A multimedia initiative about the impact of globalization, 5
July 2001)
FAO
[UN Food and Agriculture Organization] Agreement Reached On Seed Banks (UN
Wire, 2 July 2001)
The
impact of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
on human rights: Report of the High Commissioner (report prepared for United
Nations Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, 27 June
2001)
Multinationals
must stop exploiting biodiversity and abusing patent laws (Greenpeace, 25
June 2001)
BIOPIRACY:
Conference Blasts US For Profiting From Asian Resources (UN Wire, 21
June 2001)
In
Africa the Hoodia cactus keeps men alive. Now its secret is 'stolen' to make us
thin - Pharmaceutical firms stand accused of once again plundering native lore
to make fortunes from natural remedies (Antony Barnett, The Observer
[UK], 17 June 2001)
Intellectual
property rights and human rights: Report of the Secretary-General (United
Nations Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, 14 June
2001)
Protecting
the traditional knowledge of the poor nations: The world’s Least Developed
Countries (LDCs) no longer have to sit back and see their traditional knowledge,
folklore and genetic resources robbed by global players in possession of the
most modern know-how and financial muscle. This is at least what Roberto
Castelo, deputy director-general of the Geneva-based World Intellectual Property
Organisation (WIPO), says. (Ramesh Jaura, Inter Press Service, 16 May
2001)
RIGHTS:
Defending Indigenous Cultures against Globalisation (Kintto Lucas, Inter
Press Service, 8 May 2001)
Commissioner
[European Commissioner for Trade] Defends TRIPS but Acknowledges NGO Concerns
(EuropaWorld, 23 Mar. 2001)
Tripping
Over Patents: AIDS, Access to Treatment and the Manufacturing of Scarcity
[includes extensive material on South Africa] (Jonathan Michael Berger,
2001)
2000:
Who
Has the Right to Know? (Cees J. Hamelink, Professor of International
Communication at University of Amsterdam, in UNRISD News [U.N. Research Institute for Social
Development Bulletin], no. 23, autumn/winter 2000)
Rampant
biopiracy of South's biodiversity (Someshwar Singh, SUNS [South-North
Development Monitor], 20 July 2000)
ASEAN
for Protecting Indigenous/Traditional Knowledge (Chakravarthi Raghavan,
Third World Network, 5 May 2000)
Biotechnology
and Indigenous Peoples (Victoria Tauli-Corpuz, Jan. 2000, to appear in Brian
Tokar [ed.], Redesigning Life [London: Zed Books Ltd, forthcoming])
1999:
Impacts
of WTO On The Environment, Cultures and Indigenous Peoples (Victoria
Tauli-Corpuz, Director of Tebtebba Foundation [Indigenous Peoples' International
Centre for Policy Research and Education] and Convenor of Asia Indigenous
Women's Network, 29 Nov. 1999)
Indigenous
Peoples' Caucus Statement, presented at the "Roundtable on Intellectual
Property and Traditional Knowledge", World Intellectual Property Rights
Organization, Geneva, 2 Nov. 1999
Report:
An Indigenous Peoples' Information And Strategy Meeting On The World Trade
Organization (30-31 Oct. 1999, Geneva)
Protecting
IPRs [Intellectual Property Rights] of Local & Indigenous Communities (Chakravarthi
Raghavan, Third World Network, 12 Oct. 1999)
Mexico:
It's bio-plunder, not benefit-sharing (Chakravarthi Raghavan, SUNS, 3 Oct.
1999)
1998:
Kerala
Tribe Accuses Indian Biologists of Stealing Knowledge [India] (J. John and Sindhu
Menon, Panos, 6 Aug. 1998)
1997:
INDIA-TRADE:
Bio-Piracy Campaign Exposes Holes in U.S. Patent Laws (Bijoy Basant Patro,
Inter Press Service, 4 Sep. 1997)
ECUADOR-US:
Controversial Patent Agreement up for Revision (Mario Gonzalez, Inter Press
Service, 7 Aug. 1997)